Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content

T1 Chapter Case Study

Starting page

NeuroPoly Lab, Polytechnique Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Fictitious Case Study: Patient with Neurological Symptoms Consistent with MS

Patient Presentation

A 32-year-old female presents to the neurology clinic with a 3-month history of intermittent numbness and weakness in her left leg, accompanied by episodes of blurred vision in her right eye. She reports that these symptoms last for several days and then partially resolve. She has no significant past medical history but mentions a family history of autoimmune diseases.

Clinical Suspicion

The patient’s symptoms are consistent with a demyelinating disorder, such as multiple sclerosis (MS). To confirm the diagnosis, the neurologist orders an MRI of the brain and spinal cord.

McDonald Criteria (2017) for MS Diagnosis

Clinical Attacks: At least two clinical attacks with evidence of two or more lesions OR two clinical attacks with evidence of one lesion (dissemination in space, DIS) and historical evidence of a prior attack.

MRI Evidence:

  • Dissemination in space (DIS): ≥1 T2 lesion in at least 2 of 4 MS-typical regions (periventricular, cortical/juxtacortical, infratentorial, or spinal cord).

  • Dissemination in time (DIT): Simultaneous presence of gadolinium-enhancing and non-enhancing lesions OR new T2 or gadolinium-enhancing lesions on follow-up MRI.

  • CSF Analysis: Oligoclonal bands in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) can support the diagnosis if MRI criteria are not fully met.

Exclusion of Other Diagnoses: Symptoms must not be better explained by another condition.

The practicing radiologist provides you with two images and their acquisition protocols. Based on the parameters, you need to determine what types of images these are. Here are the protocols again for reference:

<Figure size 640x480 with 2 Axes>

Figure 7.1:Spoiled gradient echo, 2 mm^2 in-plane resolution, 5 mm slice, TR = 1 s, TE = 15 ms, FA = 70 degrees

<Figure size 640x480 with 2 Axes>

Figure 7.2:Spoiled gradient echo, 2 mm^2 in-plane resolution, 5 mm slice, TR = 5 s, TE = 150 ms, FA = 90 degrees

What types of MRI images are (Figure 7.1, Figure 7.2)?

A - (PD-weighted, T1-weighted)

INCORRECT ANSWER

The correct answer was: C - (T1-weighted, T2-weighted)

B - (PD-weighted, T2-weighted)

INCORRECT ANSWER

The correct answer was: C - (T1-weighted, T2-weighted)

Solution to Exercise 1
Proton density weightedT1 weightedT2 weighted
Echo Time (TE)MediumShortLong
Repetition time (TR)MediumShortLong

T1-weighted images are optimized for greater T1 contrast between tissues-of-interest, while T2-weighted images are optimized for greater T2 contrast between tissues-of-interest.

Revisiting Figure 2.8 and Figure 3.3, can you explain out why the T1w parameters were chosen to be [TR = 1 s, TE = 15 ms] and not [TR = 5s, TE = 150 ms]? Why was T2w protocol parameters [TR = 5s, TE = 150 ms] instead of [TR = 1 s, TE = 15 ms]?

Loading...

Figure 2.2:Inversion recovery curves (Eq. 2.2) for three different T1 values, approximating the main types of tissue in the brain.

Loading...

Figure 3.3:Transverse relaxation decay curves for T2 and T2* values in white matter and gray matter. The T2 and T2* constants were taken from Siemonsen et al., 2008.

A common trick is to remember that white-matter is white in T1-weighted images, and water is bright in T2-weighted images. Here are those images again:

<Figure size 640x480 with 2 Axes>

Figure 7.2:Spoiled gradient echo, 2 mm^2 in-plane resolution, 5 mm slice, TR = 5 s, TE = 150 ms, FA = 90 degrees

<Figure size 640x480 with 2 Axes>

Figure 7.1:Spoiled gradient echo, 2 mm^2 in-plane resolution, 5 mm slice, TR = 1 s, TE = 15 ms, FA = 70 degrees

Return to Case Study

The radiologist expresses concern that the standard T2-weighted image does not provide sufficient contrast to clearly identify periventricular lesions, which are a hallmark of MS. Given that these lesions are expected to consist of inflamed axon fibers with higher water content, the radiologist asks for your help in designing an imaging protocol that can better differentiate between the hyperintense CSF in the ventricles and the hyperintense periventricular lesions.

Look at Figure 7.2, can you easily identify these lesions?

From the information provided above, how do you think the T1 and T2 values will differ in a lesions vs normal white matter?

Solution to Exercise 2

The correct answer was: D - (T1 barely changes, T2 increases)

The periventricular lesions are expected to be due to inflammation that leads to odeoma, which results in an increase in water content (increasing T2) but too early for permanent dammage of the underlying structures (T1 will change, but not dramatically).

Let’s assume that the periventricular lesions have T2 is close to the ventricular T2, but that lesion T1 values remain close to their healthy values. Given what the radiologist requested from you,

the radiologist asks for your help in designing an imaging protocol that can better differentiate between the hyperintense CSF in the ventricles and the hyperintense periventricular lesions.

we want to design a pulse sequence that will provide better contrast between the periventricular lesions and the ventricles. Here’s a summary table of some expected parameters:

Healthy WMVentriclesPeriventricular lesion
T1ShortLongShort
T2ShortLongLong

After some reflection, it should become clear why periventricular lesions are difficult to be observed with simple T1w and T2w images. In T1w images, the lesions have similar signal values to the nearby WM, and in T2w images they have similar signal values to the nearby ventricles. As lesions predominently exhibit an increase in water content, we’ll want to design a sequence that has some T2-weighting, but with increase contrast between the lesion and ventricles.

Examine Figure 2.2, Figure 2.8, Figure 3.3, and Table 2. Reflect and discuss on possible strategies for designing a sequence with improved contrast between the periventricular lesions and the ventricles.

Solution to Exercise 3

If you landed on using an inversion recovery sequence with an inversion time that nulls the ventricular signal, congratulation, you just discovered FLAIR (FLuid Attenuation Inversion Recovery)!

FLAIR (FLuid Attenuation Inversion Recovery is a widely used technique, particular in suspected MS cases. It provides good T2 weighting with nearly no signal in purely ventricular regions.

Let’s design a FLAIR protocol!

Using Figure 2.5 and Figure 2.2, approximately what inversion time should your sequence have?

Solution to Exercise 4

The correct solution was D - (TI = 3 s). Here is what an inversion recovery image with this TI would look like:

<Figure size 640x480 with 2 Axes>

Figure 7.6:Inversion recovery image with TI = 3 s, TR = 5 s, TE = 15 ms, FA = 90 degrees

As you can see, ventricles are quite dark, meaning this TI nulls the ventricular signal. This is clearly deduced from Figure 2.3 by hovering the cursor over the white matter signal where it crosses 0. Here are the simulated images for the three other answers: Figure 7.3, Figure 7.4, and Figure 7.5.

Now, despite knowing the correct inversion time, we still can’t see the lesions from Figure 7.6. We need to add T2 weighting to this inversion recovery image.

What protocol should we use to get the best contrast?

Solution to Exercise 5

The correct answer was A - (TI = 3 s, TR = 10 s, TE = 150 ms, FA = 90 deg). Here’s what this FLAIR image looks like:

<Figure size 640x480 with 2 Axes>

Figure 7.7:Inversion recovery image with TI = 3 s, TR = 10 s, TE = 150 ms, FA = 90 deg

Two periventricular lesions are clearly identifiable using this imaging protocol, which were hard to see on a regular T2w image Figure 7.2. The properly timed TI nulled the ventricular signal, whereas that long TR and TE provided sufficient T2 weighting to contrast against the nearby white matter, resulting in bright lesions, which are typically called hyperintese lesions.