Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content

Introduction

Inversion Recovery

NeuroPoly Lab, Polytechnique Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Inversion Recovery T1 Mapping

Widely considered the gold standard for T1 mapping, the inversion recoverytechnique estimates T1 values by fitting the signal recovery curve acquired at different delays after an inversion pulse (180°). In a typical inversion recovery experiment (Figure 2.2.1), the magnetization at thermal equilibrium is inverted using a 180° RF pulse. After the longitudinal magnetization recovers through spin-lattice relaxation for predetermined delay (inversion time, TI), a 90° excitation pulse is applied, followed by a readout imaging sequence (typically a spin-echo or gradient-echo readout) to create a snapshot of the longitudinal magnetization state at that TI.

Inversion recovery was first developed for NMR in the 1940s Hahn, 1949Drain, 1949, and the first T1 map was acquired using a saturation-recovery technique (90° as a preparation pulse instead of 180°) by Pykett & Mansfield, 1978. Some distinct advantages of inversion recovery are its large dynamic range of signal change and an insensitivity to pulse sequence parameter imperfections Stikov et al., 2015. Despite its proven robustness at measuring T1, inversion recovery is scarcely used in practice, because conventional implementations require repetition times (TRs) on the order of 2 to 5 T1 Steen et al., 1994, making it challenging to acquire whole-organ T1 maps in a clinically feasible time. Nonetheless, it is continuously used as a reference measurement during the development of new techniques, or when comparing different T1 mapping techniques, and several variations of the inversion recovery technique have been developed, making it practical for some applications Messroghli et al., 2004Piechnik et al., 2010.

Pulse sequence of an inversion recovery experiment.

Figure 2.1:Pulse sequence of an inversion recovery experiment.

References
  1. Hahn, E. L. (1949). An accurate nuclear magnetic resonance method for measuring spin-lattice relaxation times. Physical Review, 76(1), 145. 10.1103/PhysRev.76.145
  2. Drain, L. (1949). A direct method of measuring nuclear spin-lattice relaxation times. Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section A, 62(5), 301. 10.1088/0370-1298/62/5/306
  3. Pykett, I., & Mansfield, P. (1978). A line scan image study of a tumorous rat leg by NMR. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 23(5), 961. 10.1088/0031-9155/23/5/012
  4. Stikov, N., Boudreau, M., Levesque, I. R., Tardif, C. L., Barral, J. K., & Pike, G. B. (2015). On the accuracy of T1 mapping: Searching for common ground. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 73(2), 514–522. 10.1002/mrm.25135
  5. Steen, R. G., Gronemeyer, S. A., Kingsley, P. B., Reddick, W. E., Langston, J. S., & Taylor, J. S. (1994). Precise and accurate measurement of proton T1 in human brain in vivo: validation and preliminary clinical application. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 4(5), 681–691. 10.1002/jmri.1880040511