Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content

Benefits and Pitfalls

Monoexponential T2 Mapping

NeuroPoly Lab, Polytechnique Montreal, Quebec, Canada

The main benefit of mono-exponential T2 mapping is its simplicity and straightforward implementation, making it a convenient and efficient method for T2 fitting. Additionally, as mentioned previously, the use of multi-echo spin echo (MESE) sequences significantly reduces the acquisition time, further enhancing its practicality Fatemi et al., 2020Milford et al., 2015.

Despite these advantages, mono-exponential methods have certain drawbacks. First, by assuming a single T2 relaxation constant per voxel, the mono-exponential method tends to over-simplify the tissue microstructure, potentially leading to inaccurate T2 estimations. This limitation can be particularly problematic when studying tissues that have a complex microstructure, where a single voxel may contain components with different T2 relaxation times. Furthermore, it has been shown that MESE sequences are sensitive to imperfections in the radiofrequency pulses. For instance, factors such as B1 inhomogeneities and reduced flip angles have been shown to overestimate T2 times when using mono-exponential methods Fatemi et al., 2020.

ReferencesΒΆ
  1. Fatemi, Y., Danyali, H., Helfroush, M. S., & Amiri, H. (2020). Fast T2 mapping using multi-echo spin-echo MRI: A linear order approach. Magn. Reson. Med., 84(5), 2815–2830.
  2. Milford, D., Rosbach, N., Bendszus, M., & Heiland, S. (2015). Mono-exponential fitting in T2-relaxometry: Relevance of offset and first echo. PLoS One, 10(12), e0145255.